Legal Opinion

Warburton v. City of Quincy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

A judge of the Superior Court, sitting without jury, found for the plaintiff, who was injured by reason of *112a defect in the walk or path on the grounds of a school building owned by the defendant. The defendant’s exceptions are to the denial of four requests for rulings. The findings of the trial judge are incorporated in the bill of exceptions as a “sufficient” statement of the case.

The method of government of the defendant is what is known as Plan A. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 43, §§ 46-55, inclusive, as amended. Provisions relating to the school committee are found in other sections of said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Commonwealth v. PlaistedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Morley v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co. v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. McKenna v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Southview Co-Operative Housing Corp. v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Cormier v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API