In re Cranford Material Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMacCrate, J.
Motion denied. The denial, however, is not predicated on any assumed common-law power in the Attorney-General to issue subpoenas for and to attend grand jury sessions. *155The motion serves to point the distinction between the powers of a grand jury convened under an executive order pursuant to section 62 of the Executive Law and the powers of the Attorney-General. By the Constitution it is declared there can be no suspension of the powers of a grand jury to inquire into willful misconduct of public officials (State Const, art. I, § 6). The motion is indicative of future attack on any indictment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Warner v. People ex rel. ConnerNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- People v. KramerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1900
- People Ex Rel. Wogan v. . RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Dorsey, New York County Courts1941
- Hancock v. SchroeringCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
- People v. HopkinsNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1944
- Haggerty v. HimeleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. "John Doe", New York County Courts1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.