Guy B. Barham Co. v. Unites States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
The merchandise in question in this action, consists of certain pottery imported from Mexico. Duty was assessed *141thereon under the provisions of paragraph 211 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the trade agreement with Mexico, T. D. 60797, providing, so far as: applicable, as follows:
[[Image here]]
The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 210 of said act, as amended^by said trade agreement, T. D. 50797, providing as follows:
[[Image here]]
John Arconti testified that he was the plaintiff and the sole owner of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956