Legal Opinion
Establissements Edouard Materne, S. A. v. the S.S. Leerdam
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is an action in admiralty for cargo damage sustained by a shipment of cartons of tinplate shipped on board respondent’s vessel “Leerdam” on a voyage from Philadelphia to Antwerp in October, 1951. The damage consisted of staining which was caused by oil and turpentine which leaked from drums stowed in the same compartment of the vessel as the tinplate.
It was admitted that the tinplate was received by the ship in apparent good order and condition, and that 641 cartons of the tinplate were stowed by respondent in the after part of the No. 3 shelter deck in which there…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Schroeder Bros., Inc., Libellants-Appellees v. The Saturnia and Italia Societa Anonima Di Navigazione, Claimant-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Middle East Agency v. the John B. WatermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Philippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- General Foods Corporation v. the TroubadorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. Inland Waterways Shippers Association, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- American Home Assurance Company v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- New Rotterdam Insurance Co. v. SS LOPPERSUMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963