Eberwein v. Newburgh Enlarged City School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated April 26, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision (see Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]; see Morman v Ossining Union Free School Dist., 297…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Convey v. City of Rye School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Janukajtis v. FallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Siegell v. Herricks Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Morman v. Ossining Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ronan v. School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Keaveny v. Mahopac Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Baez v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Keith S. v. East Islip Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Keith S. v. East Islip Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.