Legal Opinion

Soblick v. Schwarzbrott

New York District Court

Decided August 16, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis J. Donovan, J.

This is an action for salesman’s commissions. Defendant moves to preclude plaintiff from adducing evidence as to the items set forth in a demand for a bill of particulars. Plaintiff cross-moves for discovery and inspection of various books of account and miscellaneous fiscal records and documents, more specifically described in the moving papers.

The motion to preclude: The action was commenced on May 28, 1960 by summons with indorsement of oral complaint. By order of this court, dated June 9,1960, plaintiff was required to serve and file a long-form written complaint. The demand for a bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. L. Hoffman Co. v. Consolidated Avionics Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Pryer v. HendersonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API