Legal Opinion

Beneficial Finance Co. v. State, Bureau of Banks & Banking

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 3, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Beneficial Finance Co. (Maine) instituted a complaint pursuant to Rule 80B, M.R. Civ.P., seeking to reverse an “Order” of the Superintendent of the Bureau of Banks and Banking. A justice of the Superior Court denied the relief requested but refused to give the defendant’s mandate retroactive effect.

We sustain the plaintiff’s appeal from this ruling and dismiss the defendant’s cross-appeal therefrom.

Between May, 1972, and March, 1974, an examination of the books of the plaintiff revealed what the Superintendent of the Bureau of Banks and Banking deemed to be numerous loans…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardinali v. Planning Board of LebanonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Maine Merchants Association, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Holmes v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reagan v. Racal Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. St. Jean v. Racal MortgageDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API