Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Wager

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1999No. Docket 201457Published

1Dissent

Smolensk!, J.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I would affirm defendant’s conviction. The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress defendant’s blood alcohol test results. This evidence was thereafter admitted at trial pursuant to the parties’ stipulation.

In a prosecution for operating a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, there are four foundational requirements to the admission of the results of a chemical test of blood alcohol, one of which is “that the test was performed within a reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KozarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. KrulikowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. SchwabMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. SawyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. PrelesnikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API