Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Soy Hem

Norfolk County Circuit Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. Case No. (Criminal) CR03002487Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Marc Jacobson

Defendant Soy Hem has filed a Motion to Suppress on the grounds that the evidence sought to be suppressed “was obtained in violation of the provisions of the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, or Article One, Sections Eight, Ten, or Eleven of the Constitution of Virginia, describing illegal searches and seizures and protecting rights against self-incrimination, as well as pursuant to § 19.2-266.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended.” (See Mot. to Sup.)

Investigators Dickason and Curott of the Norfolk Police Department received…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API