Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Powell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 1995No. 1940666PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On May 5, 1992, the trial court revoked Michael Lamar Powell's probation. Thereafter, Powell, pro se, filed a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for relief from conviction or sentence, challenging the revocation of his probation; he also filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis, which the trial court denied. Powell appealed. The Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the appeal with an unpublished memorandum, holding as follows:

"The record shows that the court considered the petition and found that it was barred by the limitations period set out in Rule 32.2(c), Ala.R.Crim.P. Thus, any appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Setala v. J.C. Penney Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API