State ex rel. Ashcroft v. St. Louis No. 2, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Pursuant to a consent order entered into by all parties, the trial court appointed a receiver to continue the operations of two private health care facilities in St. Louis. This appeal arises from the trial court’s approval of the receiver’s accounting which allowed payment of wages incurred prior to the date of the consent order, which appellants — primarily the security holder — complain is contradictory to the consent order. We affirm the trial court’s approval of the receiver’s accounting.
Appellants Saint Louis No. 2, Inc. and Saint Louis No. 3, Inc., doing business as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willard v. DoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Edmiston v. J.C.G.-Medallion, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Progress Press Brick & MacHine Co. v. SpragueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Scott v. Home Mutual Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- State, Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Aging v. Brookside Nursing Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- State, Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Aging v. Cedars Nursing Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State, Department of Social Services, Division of Aging v. Colonial Healthcare Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State, Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Aging v. Brookside Nursing Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001