Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Floyd
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
We are of the. opinion that the sale and conveyance of the lands referred to in the first question, under the facts there recited, would operate to “.vest in the purchaser the title to growing and unmatured crops planted and cultivated on the lands in 1923, prior to the sale, by the grantor in the security deed in possession, the case being one where the title to such crops would have *313so vested under the law as it existed before this act,” the act referred to being the act of the General Assembly approved August 21, 1922, entitled “An act to declare that growing crops shall be personalty,”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. TranbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gunn v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Ochiltree v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Chason v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Aycock v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Atlantic Loan Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Morris v. Interstate Bond Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Renfroe v. ButtsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Finn v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.