Legal Opinion

American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign v. Jewell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 24, 2016No. 15-8033PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, The Cloud Foundation, Return to Freedom, Carol Walker, and Kimerlee Curyl filed this action against Sally Jewell, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior, and Neil Kornze, the acting director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), seeking review of BLM’s decision to remove wild horses in certain areas of public land located in southwestern Wyoming within an area known as the “Checkerboard.” Petitioners alleged, in pertinent part, that the removal violated the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, 16…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aposhian v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. New Mexico Health Connections v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Friends Animals v. SilveyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2018
  4. Western Rangeland Conservation Ass'n v. ZinkeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
  5. Schreiber v. CuccinelliCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API