Crimson Industries, Inc. v. Eller
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrawley, Judge
Crimson presents four arguments on appeal, namely: (1) that the trial court erred by failing to enter specific findings of fact and conclusions of law on legal causation and medical causation; (2) that the trial court erred by determining that Eller had established legal and medical causation; (3) that the trial court erred by accepting as expert testimony the deposition of Dr. Johnny Bates; and (4) that the court erred because its finding of permanent total disability was not supported by substantial evidence. Although I find no reversible error as to the first three arguments, I dissent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mead Paper Co. v. BrizendineCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Armstrong v. LEWIS & ASSOCIATES CONST. CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Gibson v. Southern Stone Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- M.C. Dixon Lumber Co., Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Elite Transp. Services v. HumphreysCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.