Riverside Lumber Co. v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS.
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, for the want of a sufficient bond, is well taken; but the appellants will be allowed fifteen days in which to file a sufficient bond. The bond tendered by them in reply to the motion is insufficient, because B.W. Bowland, one of the sureties thereon, is a surety on defendant's replevy bond, and judgment was rendered against him as such; and for the further reason, that evidence of the solvency of the sureties at the time of the presentation of the bond should be furnished to this court. The court will not look to the approval…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Safety Casualty Co. v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- McCamant v. McCamantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Smoot & Smoot v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.