United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bearden
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLLEY, Justice.
In this worker’s compensation case, Gilbert Bearden, plaintiff/appellee, recovered a judgment for compensation for total and permanent incapacity. The jury found the incapacity was produced by repetitious physical traumatic activities sustained by Bearden while in the course and scope of his employment with Valmac Industries (Valmac). The jury also found that the value of past nursing services provided Bearden by his wife was $90,000.
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Valmac’s insurer under the Worker’s Compensation Act,1 presents three points of error. They challenge…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schaefer v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASS'N v. EtheredgeTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Home Insurance Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mississippi Transp. Com'n v. DeweaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division, State of Texas v. Jesse Mae Blaine, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
- Mississippi Transportation Commission v. Glover I. DeweaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1993