Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1937No. 27627PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment obtained in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, by defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, against the city of Tulsa, referred to herein as defendant, for damages alleged to have been caused by the construction of certain drain pipes draining oil, base sediment, asphalt, and other ixoisonous substances from a street onto and over the surface of plaintiff’s premises whereby it was- alleged that plaintiff’s orchard was destroyed and his land was otherwise permanently injured.

The first contention presented is that the court of common pleas of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. WelshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Hodge v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Hale v. SengstackenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Provo City v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Aladdin Petroleum Corp. v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API