Walter Washington Young v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania the District Attorney for Philadelphia County
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
Walter Washington Young appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his habe-as corpus petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Section 2254 confers jurisdiction on United States district courts to entertain petitions for habe-as corpus relief only from persons who are “in custody” in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. The Supreme Court has interpreted this statutory language as requiring that, at the time his petition is filed, the petitioner must be “in custody” pursuant to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. PettifordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. PettifordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Edward R. Coss, Jr. v. Lachine County District Attorney the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Trevor Drakes v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.