Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 24, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2018-0927Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ex rel. DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-927 (TJK) JEROME H. POWELL et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 16, 2018, David Carroll Stephenson and Steven Fishman (“Relators”) filed this qui tam action against Defendants, asserting claims brought as relators on behalf of the United States under the False Claims Act (the “FCA”),

31 U.S.C. § 3729

et seq., as well as claims brought as plaintiffs on their own behalf for injunctive and declaratory relief and a writ of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
Cuthbert O. Simpkins v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
Albrecht v. Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.