Essex County Nat. Bank v. Bank of Montreal
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
1Opinion of the Court
HOPKINS, District Judge.
The testimony is not very clear as to whether the bank had currency enough on the 9th to pay the check, if payment had been insisted upon, but as this point is not material in the view I have taken of the law of this case, I shall not stop to settle it; when it was presented after certification it was not paid because the bank was insolvent.
The defendants had the check to collect It was transmitted to them for that purpose, and their duty as collecting agents was to present and demand payment within the time prescribed by law, and, if not paid, notify the proper…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Smith v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- First Nat. Bank of Jersey City v. . LeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hoover v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Chapman v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Harrison v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Metropolitan National Bank v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Minot v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Hayes v. Tootle-Lacy Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934