Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanley C. Hanks Co. v. Scherer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1951Published

1DissentGehl, J.

From the stipulation of the parties it appears that “from prior to service of the summons in this action [that resulting in the judgment here involved] and until 1946, the defendant, George Scherer, was a bona fide resident of the state of Texas,” he was out of this state.

Sec. 330.30, Stats., provides:

“If when the cause of action shall accrue against any person he shall be out of this state such action may be com*155menced within the terms herein [the chapter containing the statute of limitations] respectively limited after such person shall return or remove to this state. . . .”

The statute in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Fyn v. PowerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Estate of GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. National Bank of Oshkosh v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Rauch v. BensmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API