Legal Opinion
Lessard v. Lessard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 5, 1984No. 8326DC762PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss all claims. As to the action to forfeit defendant’s right to a share of his deceased daughter’s estate, he contends the court does not have jurisdiction through service of process on him. G.S. 1-75.8 provides in part:
“A court of this State having jurisdiction of the subject matter may exercise jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem on the grounds stated in this section. A judgment in rem or quasi in rem may affect the interests of a defendant in a status, property or thing acted upon only if process has been served…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Loft Apartments Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Tate v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cole v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Ellison v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Carmichael v. CordellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Carmichael v. CordellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022