Legal Opinion

Lessard v. Lessard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8326DC762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss all claims. As to the action to forfeit defendant’s right to a share of his deceased daughter’s estate, he contends the court does not have jurisdiction through service of process on him. G.S. 1-75.8 provides in part:

“A court of this State having jurisdiction of the subject matter may exercise jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem on the grounds stated in this section. A judgment in rem or quasi in rem may affect the interests of a defendant in a status, property or thing acted upon only if process has been served…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Loft Apartments Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Tate v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Ellison v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Carmichael v. CordellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Carmichael v. CordellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API