Legal Opinion

People v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 12, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), dated June 28, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new hearing and determination in accordance herewith.

In establishing an offender’s appropriate risk level under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. People v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API