Legal Opinion

Pack v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 11, 1992No. 1901931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court, in entering a summary judgment in favor of defendant Leverett Blankenship, correctly held that Blankenship was immune from liability under Section 14 of the Alabama Constitution of 1901.

This case involves a suit for damages against Blankenship, a state employee, who worked as an environmentalist for the Morgan County Health Department.1 The plaintiffs, Roger Pack and RDC Builders, Inc. ("RDC"), claimed to have been harmed as a result of Blankenship's representations to them regarding the installation of a sewer system.

The following…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Phillips v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Aland v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. DeStafney v. University of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Unzicker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Sherry Ross v. Jefferson County Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Shoals Community College v. ColagrossCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Matthews v. ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Lennon v. PetersenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API