Legal Opinion
Neumann v. Shroeder
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1888No. 6170PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Noonan. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.
This action was brought in justice court and by appeal taken to the district court.
The appellant had sold hides to Croll & Hansen, .who drew on the appellee for payment therefor the following instrument:
“No. 378. San Antonio, Texas, 9-31, 1886.
George Schroeder:—Pay to William Neumann one hundred and seventy dollars, (Not negotiable.)
$170.00. Croll & Hansen.”
The evidence in the case is as follows: “My name is William Neumann. I am plaintiff in this cause. On or about the twenty-first of September, 1886, Croll & Hansen were indebted to me in the sum of one hundred and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Tine v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Watson v. Rynd, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farmers' Guaranty State Bank of Jacksonville v. Burrus Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Milmo National Bank v. CobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- First Nat. Bank of Hughes Springs v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Hull v. First Guaranty State Bank of OvertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Saunders v. First Nat. Bank of BallingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.