Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. Law

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error.

1Opinion of the Court

■The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vast Syckel, J.

Law, the plaintiff below, gave to Greenwood, the defendant, a mortgage upon lands in this state for the sum of $3,700. Law alleged that Greenwood entered into a parol agreement with him to assign him this mortgage for the sum of $3,000, and brought this suit to recover damages for the refusal of Greenwood to execute said parol agreement.

*175On the trial below, a motion was made to non-suit the •plaintiff, on the ground that the alleged agreement was within the statute of frauds. The,refusal of the trial court to grant this motion is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North v. ForestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  2. Pray v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. ValentineDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965
  2. Culp v. HolbrookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Bleakley v. NelsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
  4. French v. SchoonmakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  5. Thompson v. WestNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API