Terese F. v. Saul
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff's counsel has moved for approval of attorney's fees to be paid out of the plaintiff's past-due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
*875The Commissioner agreed to remand this case upon initial review by the district court prior to any briefing. [Dkt. ##13, 14]. On remand from this court, an Administrative Law Judge for the Social Security Administration determined that plaintiff was disabled and entitled to benefits, including $51,379.00 in past-due benefits. Plaintiff and her counsel had a contingency fee agreement whereby she would pay…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houshoulder v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Ternet v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025