Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Prostaff Temporaries

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1998No. CA 97-1418Published

1DissentJohn Mauzy Pittman, Judge

I dissent because the Workers’ Compensation Commission failed to make findings on an outstanding issue. The majority opinion begins with the statement that the Commission found that appellant “failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence: 1) that she was entitled to additional temporary total disability benefits and 2) that she was entitled to medical treatment by Dr. Ted Saer.” That statement is incorrect. Although entitlement to medical treatment by Dr. Saer was in fact placed in issue before the Commission, the Commission made no mention whatsoever concerning that issue in its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Cagle Fabricating & Steel, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. White v. Air Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Shelton v. Freeland PulpwoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. DickensCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API