Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 30, 1994, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that the *586petitioner, a dentist, had denied the complainant treatment because he perceived the complainant to be at risk for HIV infection and awarded the complainant $10,000 in compensatory damages. Cross petition by the respondent to confirm the determination.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, and the determination is annulled; and it is further,

Adjudged that the cross petition is denied; and it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. SIN, Inc. v. Department of FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Sattler v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lloyd M. v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Schulman v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Cahill v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API