Cahill v. Rosa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 30, 1994, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that the *586petitioner, a dentist, had denied the complainant treatment because he perceived the complainant to be at risk for HIV infection and awarded the complainant $10,000 in compensatory damages. Cross petition by the respondent to confirm the determination.
Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, and the determination is annulled; and it is further,
Adjudged that the cross petition is denied; and it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- SIN, Inc. v. Department of FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sattler v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lloyd M. v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Schulman v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cahill v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997