Legal Opinion

Roberts v. International Bank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 5, 1928No. 4617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The International Bank, as plaintiff below, prayed judgment against Magdalena E. Gale, as maker, and Joseph P. Roberts, as indorser, of two certain promissory notes. The bank asserted that it was the purchaser of the notes for value, before maturity, and without notice of any infirmity, and that protest of the notes for nonpayment had been duly made and notice thereof given to Roberts as indorser. The maker, Gale, was not served with summons, and did not appear. Roberts was served and defended, but judgment was rendered against' him.

The two notes are identical in terms,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Patton v. Bank of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Nelson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Franklin v. BrowningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Moreland's Assignee v. Citizens' Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawley v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Omar Brown. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Aimee Estornel. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Jacob M. PaulusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. Pearson v. Washingtonian Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Government of Virgin Islands v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API