Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Georgia Power Co. v. Franco Remodeling Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1998No. A98A0156Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge

The trial court was correct. The reason Georgia Power Company as “owner or operator of [the] high-voltage lines” was not entitled to recover “costs incurred in defending [plaintiffs’] claims,” as permitted by OCGA § 46-3-40 (b) by way of indemnification from the noncomplying employer, is that the employer provided workers’ compensation coverage to the plaintiffs/employees. City of Dalton v. Gene Rogers Constr. Co., 223 Ga. App. 819 (479 SE2d 171) (1996).

The legislature has decided the public policy in such instances and has chosen to assign the risks in this manner. No one wishes to expose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Santana v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Callaway v. Crown Crafts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. City of Dalton v. Gene Rogers Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Flint Electric Membership Corp. v. Ed Smith Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API