Legal Opinion

McDowell v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 2, 1986No. 58,654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

This is an appeal by the City of Topeka from an order of the district court declaring two annexation ordinances of the city invalid. The facts were stipulated by the parties and will be summarized herein.

Plaintiffs Robert and Barbara McDowell are the owners of approximately 60 acres of unplatted land lying generally south and west of 31st Street and Wanamaker Road in Shawnee County. For convenience, the following map from the briefs of the parties showing the area in question is reproduced.

*264[[Image here]]

Mr. and Mrs. McDowell own the areas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Lenexa v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Kreamer v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. McGinnis v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of City of Overland Park for AnnexationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Cedar Creek Properties, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API