Legal Opinion

Ezell v. Williams

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1998No. 97-CA-00209-SCTPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

724 So.2d 396 (1998)

Joe H. EZELL

v.

Roger WILLIAMS, d/b/a Technical Hallmark Enterprise.

No. 97-CA-00209-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

December 10, 1998.

Harris Bell Williams, Pascagoula, Attorney for Appellant.

David E. Kihyet, Pascagoula, Attorney for Appellee.

EN BANC.

BANKS, Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. In this action a creditor failed to bring suit to collect on a promissory note within the three year statute of limitations period. Because this Court finds that the record supports a finding that the debtor induced the creditor not to sue, we affirm the circuit court's ruling that the debtor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cotton v. McConnellMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tricon Metals & Services, Inc. v. ToppMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Omnibank of Mantee v. United Southern BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Yarbrough v. CamphorMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brown v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. CargileMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Miss. Dept. of Public Safety v. StringerMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Singley v. SingleyMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. TrosclairCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003
  5. City of Newton v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API