Oliver v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Tareyton Oliver appeals his conviction for armed robbery, contending that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) the jury rendered an inconsistent verdict; and (4) the trial court erred by allowing the admission into evidence of a videotape containing a re-enactment of the crime. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Oliver contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and, concomitantly, that the trial court should have granted his motion…