Board of Transportation v. Pierce
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
The defendants appeal from an interlocutory order which they may do in this case. See Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E. 2d 772 (1967).
The appellants contend that the description in the 1938 judgment under which the State Highway and Public Works Commission acquired a right of way was not a proper description. The appellants argue that the right of way is not described specifically enough in the judgment to give the plaintiff any interest in the property. The judgment provides the State Highway and Public Works Commission shall have a “right of way one hundred…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- NEW HOME BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY v. NationsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.