Legal Opinion

Brayshaw v. Gelber

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 6, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 N.J. Super. 99 (1989)

556 A.2d 788

DAVID D. BRAYSHAW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOAN D. GELBER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted December 6, 1988.

Decided April 6, 1989.

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr., and KEEFE.

Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for appellant (James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General and Emerald L. Erickson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and Emerald L. Erickson, on the brief).

David D. Brayshaw, respondent, pro se.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

We granted leave to defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. In Re the Revocation of the License of PolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fielder v. StonackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Russell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bombace v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Canico v. HurtadoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Mesgleski v. OraboniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API