Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dunn

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 29, 1974No. 74-254-NA-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge:

A provision of the Tennessee Election Code has the effect, in certain situations, of requiring persons under disability of blindness to reveal their vote to two election judges 1 in order to receive assistance in marking their ballots at elections. The question presented in this case is whether this state requirement denies blind persons rights protected by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Plaintiffs, individually and as authorized committee members of the organizations they represent, are qualified voters of the State of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Selph v. Council of City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1975
  2. City of Greenfield v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  3. Kenneth J. Sigel, M.D. v. The Monarch Condominium Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API