Smith v. Dunn
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge:
A provision of the Tennessee Election Code has the effect, in certain situations, of requiring persons under disability of blindness to reveal their vote to two election judges 1 in order to receive assistance in marking their ballots at elections. The question presented in this case is whether this state requirement denies blind persons rights protected by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Plaintiffs, individually and as authorized committee members of the organizations they represent, are qualified voters of the State of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Selph v. Council of City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1975
- City of Greenfield v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Kenneth J. Sigel, M.D. v. The Monarch Condominium Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012