Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Cherry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1962No. 7350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is an action for declaratory judgment and alternatively in trespass to try title and for damages. The trial court instructed a verdict. Judgment that plaintiffs take nothing is affirmed.

The suit was filed by heirs of Mahaly Mann Nero, deceased, and such parties’ vendees, as co-plaintiffs. These plaintiffs sought to establish title to an undivided interest in a 38 acre tract of land in the John Tomlinson Survey of Rusk County. They plead that the 38 acre tract was a part of a 46 acre tract acquired by Granville Nero and his first wife, Mahaly Nero, by a parol sale,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Heirs of Shelby Corzine v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hardy v. De LeonTexas Supreme Court · 1849

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Angell v. Bailey, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
  2. Hart v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Fuller v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Debra Warner Angell v. S. A. Bailey, Jack Ellison, Their Unknown Heirs, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API