Waldo v. Waldo
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Gridley J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Graves O. J.
It is not going far to say that this litigation has been made a pretext for discussions which do not belong to it. The subject may be best sifted and explained by referring — -first, to certain illustrating facts which are not disputed ; and secondly, to the effect due to the pleadings. By such means we may see what were the questions to be tried and what matters were irrelevant and how the points now agitated by the defense ought to be considered.
In August, 1864, the plaintiff resided in the state of Indiana, and then and there intermarried with one Henry Carey. In January, 1871,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wales v. NewbouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- McLeod v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Osburn v. LovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Bailey v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Newkirk v. SablerNew York Supreme Court · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Ellis' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bledsoe v. SeamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Andrews v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- James v. Emmet Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.