Legal Opinion
Traina v. New York State Olympic Regional Development Authority
New York Court of Claims
Decided June 22, 1995No. Motion No. M-51587PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John L. Bell, J.
In Pandolph v State of New York (155 Misc 2d 612), this court held that the Court of Claims did not have subject matter jurisdiction over claims against the Olympic Regional Development Authority (hereinafter ORDA or the authority). The Legislature subsequently amended Public Authorities Law § 2622 to confer exclusive jurisdiction upon the Court of Claims to hear claims against ORDA "to recover damages for injuries to property or for personal injury arising out of the operation by the authority of any participating Olympic facility owned by the state or of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gavigan v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Pandolph v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Tyson v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp.New York Court of Claims · 2003
- Plath v. New York State Olympic Regional Development AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 2002