Beach v. Gendler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Albert Gendler the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Blue Earth county and the Honorable W. L. Comstock, judge thereof, to review proceedings brought in that court under the compensation -act by William A. Beach-as employee, against relator as employer.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Certiorari to review a judgment entered under the Workmen’s Compensation law in force in 1917.
On December 13, 1917, William Finch, while in the employ of defendant, had a toe accidentally injured necessitating surgical treatment. Finch and defendant were under the compensation act. A settlement between them was effected and approved by the court. Defendant, or his insurer, also voluntarily paid $200 to those who had given medical treatment and hospital services to Finch on account of the injury. This did not pay them in full, and what was paid was not paid pursuant to any direction of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Milwaukee v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Manthey v. SchuelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Trustees of the State Hospital of the Middle Coal Field v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Henkel v. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Donovan v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Lemmer v. Batzli Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Merrimac Anthracite Coal Corp. v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Tatro v. Hartmann's StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.