Legal Opinion

Shockey v. McCauley

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County (Jones, C. J., and Thomas, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

This is an action of slander, brought by the appellee against the appellant, for words spoken of the latter by the former.

The words alleged to have been spoken are, “he (meaning the appellee) stole them pulleys;” “he stole them pulleys and trip rope;” and “he stole the pulleys and rope.”

There is no inducement showing the connection in which the words were used; nor innuendo or colloquium, set out in the declaration.

The plea was the general issue. Judgment was for the appellee and the defendant has appealed.

There can be no dispute that the words set out in the narr., according to their usual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coffin v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  2. Garrett v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  3. Maynard v. BeardsleyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  4. McClintock v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  5. Long v. EakleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Cheek v. J. B. G. Properties, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. American Stores Co. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Henthorn v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API