Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pryor v. Craft

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1947No. 31066Published

1Dissent

GIBSON, J. (dissenting).

I concur in the following conclusions reached in the majority opinion: (1) That the estate which Woodrow Pryor inherited from his father was an absolute estate, and (2) that upon his death his estate therein passed to his heirs under the laws of the United States.

With these two conclusions as the premise, the sole remaining question is what such laws provide, and is therefore simply one of construction. It is the holding of the majority that subdivision 7 (84 O.S. 1941 §213) is applicable and therefore controlling. In this 1 cannot concur. In my opinion subdivision 7…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Grayson v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Seal v. BanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Davis v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API