Legal Opinion

Casto v. Board of Education

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

cited Code, c. 45, s. 13; 39 Kan. 347; 4 Gusli. 494; 35 N. II. 477; 28 W. Ya. 232.

1Opinion of the Court

.Brannon, President :

Action by Casto against the board of education of Ripley district, Jackson county, for failure to allow Casto to teach a school under a contract employing him to do so. The facts are that Casto and Sharnblin and .Boggess, two-of the school trustees, were present at a meeting of the board of education; that the board appointed a trustee iu place of Boggess, but the appointee did not qualify that day; that Sliambliu and Boggess agreed before leaving tlie place where the boat'd of education was in session, to employ Casto to teach a school; that Fisher the third trustee, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wintz v. Board of Education of Charleston DistrictWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cade v. City of BelingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Cunningham v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Capehart v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API