Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Fukagawa

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2002No. 22810Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion of

ACOBA, J.

I believe that Defendant-Appellant Ivan Fukagawa (Defendant) met the threshold requirements for a de minimis dismissal in this drug possession case and that the denial of his motion to dismiss on the grounds announced by the circuit court of the second circuit (the court) was an abuse of discretion.1 I do not agree, as the majority contends, that a disqualifying “inquiry” for drug de minimis cases is whether the amount of a drug possessed is capable of producing any pharmacological or physiological effect. See majority opinion at 506, 60 P.3d at 907. That…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. MaupinOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. KlingeHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BalanzaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. VanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. LloydHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API