Legal Opinion

Findley v. Wyser ex rel. Colgin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE TAYLOR

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The principal question in this case is, can a witness who has been summoned at the instance of a person who is a party to more than one -mit, at issue in the same Court and at the same time, prove his attendance and be entitled to compensation in each case, or in one only ?

Perry, for plaintiff. Owen and Ellis, for defendant in error.

The Court are of opinion that the witness has the same right to compensation in all and each of the cases, that he would have in one, if but one was pending. He is equally bound to attend in all, and if he fail to do…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carville ex rel. Wamack v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API