Legal Opinion

People v. Berkley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 1, 1996No. 95SA292, 96SA48PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in these two consolidated lawyer discipline proceedings has admitted in two separate stipulations, agreements and conditional admissions of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, that he neglected five client matters. The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in a range from six months to one year and one day, and pay certain restitution. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admissions, and recommended suspension for one year and one day. We accept the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. People v. BerkleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SchmeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. SegalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. StillmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API