Legal Opinion
Isaac Ramirez v. R.A. Castro, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 2004No. 02-56066PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
365 F.3d 755
Isaac RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
R.A. CASTRO, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 02-56066.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued July 18, 2003.
Submitted January 8, 2004.
Filed April 19, 2004.
As Amended April 27, 2004.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California; Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General; Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Raquel M. Gonzalez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; and Quisteen S. Shum, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA for the respondent-appellant.
Petitioner-appellee Isaac Ramirez in pro se.
A…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC)Kakowski v. PollardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020