Fixico v. Frank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
The parties to this action appear as in the court below. However, since this cause was filed in the Supreme court, one of the plaintiffs, Nocus Fixico, died and the cause, by agreement, is revived in the name of Rhina Bear and California Fixico, as plaintiffs in error.
Plaintiffs in error, Nocus Fixico and Rhina Bear, iuitit ted this action by filing their petition in the district court of Okfus-kee . county, joining two causes of action; (1) For the possession of 160 acres of land in Okfuskee county, described as the west half of the northwest quarter of section 24, township 11 north, range 8…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Herrera v. Zia Land Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947