Legal Opinion

Dexter Duren v. URS Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2017No. 16-1778UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Dexter Duren and DeArthur Grice appeal the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment dismissing certain of their employment-discrimination and retaliation claims against URS Corporation. Reviewing the grant of summary judgment de novo, see Inechien v. Nichols Alum., LLC, 728 F.3d 816, 819 (8th Cir. 2013), we affirm.

In November 2007, URS acquired a corporation that had been hired by the U.S. Department of Defense to operate an incineration plant to destroy chemical weapons at the Army’s Pine Bluff Arsenal. Duren was employed at the plant as an Information Systems Administrator. Grice was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. DAVID GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. CITY OF DES MOINES, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEESCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. Hays v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Charles Inechien v. Nichols Aluminum, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Calvin DelormeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API